Skip to content

Replies

0
Dana Comolli
Dana Comolli answered on Nov 6, 2015 2:55 PM

Thanks for submitting the enhancement request.  It really is something that is missing.  I will definitely vote for it.

As far as the prior suggestion working, it does if the SummaryDisplayArea is defined in the override object only.  If it is defined for the specific summaries (which is the case in my application) it does not work.  The code has to manipulate the summary values instead.  An additional suggestion would be a way override (or make the override actually override) what is defined at the summary level.

0
Dana Comolli
Dana Comolli answered on Nov 5, 2015 9:09 PM

That does not work if the display areas are defined as part of the summary.

It seems the short of it is that there is not built-in summary definition that says place summaries at the footer of grouped values and no where else.  The only way to make it work is to change the location of the summaries in code based on the grouped status of the grid.

0
Dana Comolli
Dana Comolli answered on Nov 5, 2015 6:23 PM

Yes, I know.  But that only works when they are groups.  When there are no groups, it still puts a summary on the bottom which I do not want.

0
Dana Comolli
Dana Comolli answered on Nov 4, 2015 10:47 PM

I am sorry, but I guess I did not make it clear as to what I am trying to accomplish.  What I want is summary rows in the footer of each group for the values I have defined summary values for (don't care what field is being grouped by) and I don't ever want a summary row at the bottom of the grid.  It seems like you can have a summary row at the bottom of the grid and in the footer of a group, but not just in the footer of the group.

I have attached an annotated screen shot to help clarify what I want to accomplish.