Are there any diagnostic features available with the Persistence Framework?
My standalone version works as expected. When I apply a hierarchical XamGrid to a custom eTrading framework the uses MEF, Jason Serialization, User Persistence, persistence fails with no exception or hint. If I revert to the previous version of the XamGrid, that has non-hierarchical or is flat, persistence works as expected.
Support Ticket: http://ko.infragistics.com/my-account/support-case/CAS-174741-Z2J1F5
Regards,
Michael Perini
Hello Michael,
Thank you for your post(s).
Currently, I do not believe there are any 'diagnostic' features available for the Persistence Framework, but I am a little bit unsure exactly what you mean by this? What types of features are you looking for in the persistence framework that would be classified as 'diagnostic' ones? Would it be possible for you to please provide some more detail on this?
Regarding the issues that you are seeing with the persistence framework and a hierarchical XamGrid, I am not entirely sure of the details that are happening within your eTrading framework with regards to MEF and JSON Serialization, but I am unsure if this should really matter, as the operations for the Persistence Framework should happen external to this eTrading framework. Would it be possible for you to please provide some more details on what parts of the XamGrid that you are not seeing persisted if you still require assistance on this matter? When using the XamGrid hierarchically, do these issues also happen prior to the grid being applied to your custom eTrading framework as well?
Please let me know if you have any other questions or concerns on this matter.
Sincerely,AndrewAssociate Developer
Given there was no response the assumption is there are no diagnostic features available for the Persistence Framework :-(
I decided to take a different approach, replacing ig:ColumnLayout with ig:TempateColumnLayout.
And thanks to Rob from Infragistics this step is now completed, converters were required to complete the task.
This thread should be marked completed.
-Michael