Hi,
I have a situation where I have an UltraWebGrid that resides on an UltraWebTab control. I have client-side buttons for adding/deleting rows from the grid. This grid behaves pefectly normal when I don't include any AJAX functionality. However, when I do have AJAX functionality (like simply turning the AsyncMode to On in the UltraWebTab), then the grid will re-issue the add/delete if the user performs the following steps:
(Assume that we have a tab control with 2 tabs. Tab 1 contains an UltraWebGrid, and two input type="button" controls for adding/deleting. Tab 2 contains nothing. External to the tabs is an asp:button, with a server-side event handler.)
1. User begins on tab 1, and clicks on the Add button. A new row is added to the grid.2. User changes to Tab 2.3. User initiates a full Postback while on tab 2 by clicking on the asp:Button.
When the user goes back to tab 1, there is a second new (phantom) row that has been added to the grid.
Notes:a) This behaviour is also present when doing client-side deletions. (The row immediately below the one the user intentionally deleted gets "phantom" deleted.)b) If we insert a step 2b, where the user changes back to Tab 1 before doing the full postback, everything works properly.c) If we turn the tab's AsyncMode Off everything works properly, UNLESS we add an UpdatePanel to tab 2, and we trigger an event that causes a partial postback (before initiatlng the full postback). Therefore, the problem appears to be with the partial postback model, and nothing that is unique to the Async Mode of the tab control. (The tab control just happens to use partial postbacks while using Async Mode.)
I have been able to reproduce this behaviour in a sample project, to remove all third-party dependencies, and take data binding out of the equation. I have included it as an attachment.
Has anyone experienced anything like this? Any ideas?
Thanks to anyone who has read this far!
Jamie
I forgot the version info:
Infragistics 2009 Vol 2, .NET 3.5, Visual Studio 2008.
Internet Explorer 7 and 8 will both reproduce the problem.
Thanks,
Hello Jamie,
Thank you for your cooperation. I am able to replicate the issue based on your sample. I am going to test it with latest service release but i suspect that the issue still exists. Now I will create a support ticket in your behalf and then I will create a Development issue. I will keep you informed.
I apologize for the late response, but please keep in mind when you think that something is a bug just go ahead and create a support ticket directly.
Hello,
Thank you for your sample. I am going to take a look at the code and I will inform you about my findings.