Has the new release come out yet?

sry guys, any help on this one?

Can I load my own .jpeg as map tile and present it with together with a shape file?

Hello,

Can you please explain your use case a bit so I can better understand what you'd like to accomplish by adding a jpeg as a map tile?

Thanks,

hi.

sry I couldnt answer earlier.

Well essentially I have a jpeg image of building floor. I also have a shape file of some objects inside of that building. I want to use image as a background... (same like your airplane example http://labs.infragistics.com/silverlightdv/Showcases/AirplaneSeatingMap/ just I need to have paning and zooming..)

Hi,

I'd like to do a similar thing as grabah above.

I have a code-behind function which gets called during Map_Loaded, 

<igMap:XamMap x:Name="map" Loaded="map_Loaded" >  

 <igMap:XamMap.Layers>

 <igMap:MapLayer x:Name="WorldTopoLayer" IsSensitive="False" ShadowFill="Transparent"  />

 </igMap:XamMap.Layers>

</igMap:XamMap>

private void map_Loaded(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
{

AddPictureToMap("WashingtonTopoLayer", "../img/washington-bw.png", "", Settings.GPSTopLeft.X,
 Settings.GPSTopLeft.Y, Settings.GPSBottomRight.X, Settings.GPSBottomRight.Y);

}

private void AddPictureToMap(string layerName, String fileContents, String myCaption, double left, double top,
                                     double right, double bottom)
        {
            if (map == null || map.Layers[layerName] == null)
                return;

            // Polyline collection to hold points for shape
            var lines = new MapPolylineCollection();
 
            var points = new List<Point>();
 
            // Points to make the shape
            points.Add(new Point(left, top));
            points.Add(new Point(right, top));
            points.Add(new Point(right, bottom));
            points.Add(new Point(left, bottom));
 
            // Convert Geodetic to RelativeCartesian coordinates
            lines.Add(map.MapProjection.ProjectToMap(points));
 
            var b = new ImageBrush();
            b.Opacity = 1;
            b.Stretch = Stretch.UniformToFill; //tried different settings here: [Stretch.None (no picture shows up), the rest of them have the same problem]
 
            if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(fileContents) && fileContents.StartsWith("../"))
                b.ImageSource = new BitmapImage(new Uri(fileContents, UriKind.Relative));
 
 
            // Create surface element and position shape using polylines
            var surfaceElement = new SurfaceElement
            {
                Polylines = lines,
                Fill = b,
                Caption = myCaption,
                StrokeThickness = 0,
                Name = myCaption
            };
 
 
            surfaceElement.ShadowFill = new SolidColorBrush(Colors.Transparent);
 
 
            map.Layers[layerName].Elements.Add(surfaceElement);
 
 
            Rect worldRect = surfaceElement.WorldRect;
            worldRect = lines.GetWorldRect();
            surfaceElement.WorldRect = worldRect;
        }

this currently works... except that when you try to PAN so that the surface element goes OFF the screen, then instead of going off the screen nicely, the surface element's Fill (ImageBrush) Stretches the Image so that it fits in the remaining portion of the screen (washington gets squashed, but points and lines correctly stay at their GPS coordinates - off the screen).  Please help!

Hello Will,

Thank you for your post. I have been looking into it and it seems like that I am missing something in your scenario, so if this is still an issue for you, could you please send an isolated sample project, where the issue is reproduced, so I can investigate it further for you.

Looking forward for your reply.

Hi,

Unfortunately the surface element is being clipped when it goes out of bounds so using an image brush in this manner will cause the image to get squashed when the surface element is partly occluded.

To support your request we may need to introduce a type of element that does not get clipped by the map boundary in this manner. I would recommend making a feature request.

In the meantime I'll see if there is some other way to satisfy your request, but it may not be possible without additional feature work.

-Graham