I second that. The product is great, it's powerful, but it's so powerful that a) MUCH more detailed information and tutorials s/b available b) a 'streamline' mode that would be closer to the standard controls would be great c) responses geared to newbies would be great d) Some thought be given to the fact that different settings can override each other, alter behavior that's seemingly unrelated (in list only preventing you from losing focus on a control - the control 'takes over' the form, for example).

 The controls are great, but their default behavior sometimes amazes me (a drop-down that does NOT take up the whole width of the control by default is a good example).

I think the product is SO complex, has SO many bells and whistles, that it's sometimes needlessly difficult (i.e. looping through all rows and needing to set PerformAutoResize(PerformAutoSizeType.AllRowsInBand) on each row to get the equivilent of what ONE property setting (no looping!) will do on a standard gird. That's insane. I use your stuff even when I don't need the added functionality because of a) appstylist and b) common routines - but many of my routines to populate grids etc. are needlessly complex because the defaults seem so odd and arbitrary, and because, depsite the dizzying array of properties, one still has to do zany things like the loop mentioned above to produce a very simple 'stock' type of behavior.

 That said, they still rock. They're just a pain as they rock...