Good afternoon,
I've a problem with a XamNumericEditor. Even if I set the digits on the mask to something bigger than 9 it only takes 9 digits. However if I set it to something smaller than 9 it works. It seems like there is a limit of "9" when the editing data type is double, is it?
Here is the style I use:
<Style TargetType="{x:Type igEditors:XamNumericEditor}" >
<Setter Property="Mask" Value="{}{double:11.2:c}" />
</Style>
I am using XamDatagrid version 11.1.
Thanks for any help.
Hello Jairo,
Thank you for your post.
I have been looking into it and have created a small sample application, using the provided code snippet, I order to test the mentioned functionality for the xamNumericEditor. I have no luck reproducing the issue. I have attached the sample application for your reference. Would you please modify the sample application with the functionality you are using. This way I would be able to reproduce the issue and provide you with further support.
Thank you for the cooperation. Looking forward to hearing from you.
Hi Gergana,
Thanks for the reply.
Ok maybe I should have explained a little more. The problem happens when the XamDataGrid is editable and we use the standard XamNumericEditor in it to edit doubles. When we double click on a field the XamNumericEditor comes into action and when we edit a number of the "double" data type we can only get 9 significant digits in it (i.e: 987654321.11 will work but 987654321012.11 won't).
Thank you for the feedback. I am glad I was able to help.
Thanks Gergana, it worked.
I am just checking your progress on this issue. Please do not hesitate to let me know if you have any further questions on this matter.
I have been looking into your issue. I have created a new sample application. The sample has a xamDataGrid, which editing settings are set. I have also added the style for the XamNumericEditor. I am not able to reproduce the issue. In the sample application I am using the last service release for NetAdvantage 11.1 – 2282.
Would you please modify the sample application with the functionality you are using, so it shows the issue? This way I would be able to further research this issue for you.
Thank you in advance for the cooperation. Looking forward to hearing from you.